<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Zot on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/zot/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Zot on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/zot/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Container Image Registries for Production: Distribution vs Zot vs Harbor</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-14-container-image-registries-distribution-zot-harbor/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-14-container-image-registries-distribution-zot-harbor/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Managing container images at scale requires a reliable, self-hosted registry. Whether you&amp;rsquo;re running Kubernetes clusters, CI/CD pipelines, or air-gapped environments, the choice of container registry directly impacts security, performance, and operational complexity. This guide compares three leading open-source OCI-compliant registries: Docker Distribution (the reference implementation), Zot (a modern, scale-out registry), and Harbor (a full-featured enterprise registry).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
