<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Threat-Intelligence on Pi Stack</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/threat-intelligence/</link><description>Recent content in Threat-Intelligence on Pi Stack</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/threat-intelligence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>MISP vs OpenCTI vs IntelOwl: Best Self-Hosted Threat Intelligence Platform 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/misp-vs-opencti-vs-intelowl-self-hosted-threat-intelligence-guide-2026/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/misp-vs-opencti-vs-intelowl-self-hosted-threat-intelligence-guide-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>Threat intelligence has become a cornerstone of modern cybersecurity operations. Security teams need to enrich indicators of compromise (IOCs), correlate attack patterns, and share actionable intel across organizations — all without sending sensitive data to third-party cloud providers. In 2026, three open-source platforms dominate the self-hosted threat intelligence landscape: &lt;strong>MISP&lt;/strong>, &lt;strong>OpenCTI&lt;/strong>, and &lt;strong>IntelOwl&lt;/strong>. Each takes a different approach to collecting, organizing, and acting on threat data. This guide compares all three in detail, with complete &lt;a href="https://www.docker.com/">docker&lt;/a> deployment instructions so you can run any of them on your own infrastructure.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>