<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Thermal on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/thermal/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Thermal on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/thermal/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Linux Thermal Management: thermald vs TLP vs auto-cpufreq (2026)</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-30-self-hosted-linux-thermal-management-thermald-tlp-auto-cpufreq-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-30-self-hosted-linux-thermal-management-thermald-tlp-auto-cpufreq-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Managing thermal performance on Linux servers is critical for maintaining system stability, reducing hardware wear, and optimizing power consumption. While the Linux kernel provides basic thermal management through the thermal subsystem, user-space tools add intelligent control policies, power profiles, and CPU frequency scaling. This guide compares three leading thermal and power management tools: thermald, TLP, and auto-cpufreq.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
