<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Text-Editor on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/text-editor/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Text-Editor on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/text-editor/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Helix vs Neovim vs Kakoune in 2026: Which Modal Editor Should You Actually Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-01-helix-vs-neovim-vs-kakoune-modal-editor-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-01-helix-vs-neovim-vs-kakoune-modal-editor-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You will spend roughly 5,000 hours in your editor over the next decade. Modal editors promise to make those hours faster, but choosing between them is harder than ever: Neovim crossed &lt;strong&gt;102,000 GitHub stars&lt;/strong&gt; in 2026, Helix sits at &lt;strong&gt;46,000&lt;/strong&gt; with a design philosophy that rejects plugins entirely, and Kakoune — the oldest of the three — quietly redefines what &amp;ldquo;editing&amp;rdquo; means with its client-server model and native multi-cursor workflow. Pick wrong and you will fight your own tooling for years. This guide breaks down exactly what each editor gets right, where it hurts, and who should choose what.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
