<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tape on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/tape/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Tape on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/tape/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Tape Backup &amp; Archival: Bacula vs Bareos vs Amanda</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-02-tape-backup-archival-bacula-bareos-amanda-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-02-tape-backup-archival-bacula-bareos-amanda-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Despite the dominance of cloud storage and disk-based backups, tape remains the most cost-effective medium for long-term data archival. LTO-9 tapes store 18TB (native) per cartridge at roughly $5/TB — a fraction of cloud archival storage costs over a 5-10 year retention period. For organizations with compliance requirements, tape provides immutable, air-gapped protection that no online system can match.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
