<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Saml on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/saml/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Saml on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/saml/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>SimpleSAMLphp vs Shibboleth vs Apereo CAS: Self-Hosted SAML IdP Guide 2026</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-04-27-simplesamlphp-vs-shibboleth-vs-apereo-cas-self-hosted-saml-idp-guide-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-04-27-simplesamlphp-vs-shibboleth-vs-apereo-cas-self-hosted-saml-idp-guide-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When you need SAML 2.0 single sign-on for your organization, relying on a cloud identity provider isn&amp;rsquo;t always an option. Compliance requirements, data sovereignty, air-gapped networks, or cost constraints push many teams to run their own SAML Identity Provider (IdP). This guide compares the three most established open-source SAML IdP solutions: &lt;strong&gt;SimpleSAMLphp&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Shibboleth IdP&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Apereo CAS&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
