<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Roslyn on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/roslyn/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Roslyn on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/roslyn/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>StyleCop.Analyzers vs SonarAnalyzer vs Meziantou.Analyzer in 2026: Which C# Analyzer Should You Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-20-csharp-roslyn-analyzers-stylecop-sonaranalyzer-meziantou-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-20-csharp-roslyn-analyzers-stylecop-sonaranalyzer-meziantou-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A 2025 study of 1,200 .NET repositories found that &lt;strong&gt;over 60% of the bugs shipped to production could have been caught by a Roslyn analyzer at write time&lt;/strong&gt; — null-dereference risks, missing cancellation-token forwarding, culture-sensitive string comparisons, and async deadlocks. Yet most C# teams still rely on compiler warnings alone. The three heavyweights in this space are StyleCop.Analyzers, SonarAnalyzer, and Meziantou.Analyzer, and they are &lt;strong&gt;not interchangeable&lt;/strong&gt;: each targets a different failure mode. Here is how to pick the right one (or combination) for your codebase in 2026.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
