<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reporting on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/reporting/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Reporting on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/reporting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted SLA Compliance &amp; Uptime Reporting: Uptime Kuma vs Cachet vs Gatus (2026)</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-04-self-hosted-sla-compliance-uptime-reporting-uptime-kuma-cachet-gatus-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-04-self-hosted-sla-compliance-uptime-reporting-uptime-kuma-cachet-gatus-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When your service contracts guarantee 99.9% uptime, a simple green/red status indicator isn&amp;rsquo;t enough. You need documented SLA compliance reports, historical uptime percentages, incident timelines, and breach alerting — all evidence that holds up during vendor reviews and customer audits. Cloud monitoring platforms like Pingdom and Datadog charge premium pricing for SLA reporting features, but you can build the same capability with open-source tools running on your own infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
