<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refit on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/refit/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Refit on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/refit/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>C# HTTP Client Libraries Compared: RestSharp vs Refit vs HttpClientFactory — Which One Should You Use in 2026?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-02-csharp-http-client-libraries-restsharp-refit-httpclientfactory/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-02-csharp-http-client-libraries-restsharp-refit-httpclientfactory/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Making HTTP calls is one of the most fundamental operations in modern application development. Whether you&amp;rsquo;re consuming REST APIs, downloading files, or communicating with microservices, your choice of HTTP client library has a direct impact on your code&amp;rsquo;s readability, maintainability, and performance. In the .NET ecosystem, three options stand out: &lt;strong&gt;RestSharp&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Refit&lt;/strong&gt;, and the built-in &lt;strong&gt;HttpClientFactory&lt;/strong&gt;. Each takes a fundamentally different approach to HTTP communication, and choosing the wrong one can lead to verbose, error-prone code — or worse, socket exhaustion under load.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
