<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Recovery on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/recovery/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Recovery on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/recovery/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted System Rescue &amp; Recovery Environments: SystemRescue vs Rescuezilla vs Finnix</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-07-self-hosted-system-rescue-recovery-systemrescue-rescuezilla-finnix-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-07-self-hosted-system-rescue-recovery-systemrescue-rescuezilla-finnix-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When a production server fails to boot, you need a rescue environment — and fast. Rather than fumbling for USB sticks during a 3 AM outage, self-hosting PXE-bootable rescue environments means every machine in your data center is one reboot away from a full diagnostic toolkit. We compare three open-source rescue distributions: &lt;strong&gt;SystemRescue&lt;/strong&gt; (formerly SystemRescueCd), &lt;strong&gt;Rescuezilla&lt;/strong&gt; (the GUI disk imaging specialist), and &lt;strong&gt;Finnix&lt;/strong&gt; (the tiny-but-mighty recovery distro).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
