<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rancher on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/rancher/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Rancher on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/rancher/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Kubernetes Local Persistent Volume Provisioners: Rancher vs Static vs OpenEBS</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-03-kubernetes-local-pv-provisioners-rancher-static-openebs-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-03-kubernetes-local-pv-provisioners-rancher-static-openebs-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;While network storage systems like Ceph and Longhorn power enterprise Kubernetes clusters, many workloads perform best with directly attached storage — databases, log processors, and local caching layers all benefit from the low latency and high throughput of local SSDs. Kubernetes supports local persistent volumes natively, but managing them at scale requires purpose-built provisioners that automate volume lifecycle management.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
