<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>R-Markdown on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/r-markdown/</link>
    <description>Recent content in R-Markdown on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/r-markdown/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Quarto vs R Markdown vs Bookdown in 2026: Which Reproducible Publishing Stack Should You Actually Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-16-quarto-vs-r-markdown-vs-bookdown-reproducible-publishing/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-16-quarto-vs-r-markdown-vs-bookdown-reproducible-publishing/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every research group and platform team eventually hits the same wall: the analysis is reproducible, the &lt;em&gt;document&lt;/em&gt; is not. Figures get pasted manually, the PDF drifts three revisions behind the notebook, and the person who knows which script generated table 4 left the company. Picking the wrong publishing stack means you rebuild that pipeline from scratch in eighteen months.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
