<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Quantum-Computing on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/quantum-computing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Quantum-Computing on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/quantum-computing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Quantum Computing Simulators: Qiskit vs Cirq vs ProjectQ</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-09-self-hosted-quantum-computing-simulators-qiskit-cirq-projectq/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-09-self-hosted-quantum-computing-simulators-qiskit-cirq-projectq/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum computing promises to solve problems that are intractable for classical computers — from drug discovery to materials science to cryptography. But real quantum hardware remains scarce and expensive, with access gated behind cloud providers like IBM Quantum and AWS Braket. Self-hosted quantum computing simulators let you develop and test quantum algorithms on your own infrastructure, without usage quotas or per-shot billing. In this comparison, we evaluate three leading open-source frameworks: &lt;strong&gt;Qiskit&lt;/strong&gt; (IBM), &lt;strong&gt;Cirq&lt;/strong&gt; (Google), and &lt;strong&gt;ProjectQ&lt;/strong&gt; (ETH Zurich).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
