<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pinning on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/pinning/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Pinning on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 08:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/pinning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted IPFS Pinning &amp; Content Distribution: IPFS Cluster vs Crust vs Kubo 2026</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-09-self-hosted-ipfs-pinning-content-distribution-cluster-crust-kubo-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-09-self-hosted-ipfs-pinning-content-distribution-cluster-crust-kubo-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) has become the backbone of decentralized content storage, but running a single IPFS node isn&amp;rsquo;t enough for production workloads. Content eviction, unreliable pinning, and lack of redundancy make standalone nodes unsuitable for serving websites, hosting datasets, or distributing software packages. This guide compares three self-hosted approaches to IPFS pinning and content distribution that keep your data persistent and accessible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
