<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Peer-Review on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/peer-review/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Peer-Review on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/peer-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Academic Peer Review Systems: Managing the Scholarly Review Pipeline</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-11-academic-peer-review-systems-ops-ojs-custom/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-11-academic-peer-review-systems-ops-ojs-custom/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Peer review is the backbone of scholarly communication, yet the systems that manage this critical process are often opaque, expensive, and controlled by commercial publishers. For independent journals, university presses, and open access initiatives, self-hosted peer review platforms offer an alternative: full control over the editorial workflow, reviewer databases, and manuscript tracking — without per-submission fees or vendor lock-in.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
