<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Opensmile on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/opensmile/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Opensmile on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/opensmile/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Praat vs openSMILE vs audioFlux in 2026: Which Open-Source Speech Analysis Tool Actually Fits Your Research?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-16-speech-analysis-praat-opensmile-audioflux-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-16-speech-analysis-praat-opensmile-audioflux-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Speech researchers get squeezed from both sides. Commercial annotation suites quote per-seat prices that eat an entire grant line, while generic audio libraries give you a spectrogram and wish you luck with the rest. Three open tools cover almost every real workflow — &lt;strong&gt;Praat&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;openSMILE&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;audioFlux&lt;/strong&gt; — but they were built for genuinely different jobs, and using the wrong one costs weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
