<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Open-Source-Eda on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/open-source-eda/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Open-Source-Eda on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/open-source-eda/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OpenROAD vs OpenLane vs KLayout in 2026: The Open-Source Chip Design Stack Compared</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-11-07-openroad-vs-openlane-vs-klayout-open-source-asic-flow/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-11-07-openroad-vs-openlane-vs-klayout-open-source-asic-flow/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A single 5nm mask set costs more than $15 million. That number is why most hardware startups never see their own silicon. But the economics changed at the older nodes: with an open PDK such as SkyWater SKY130 or GlobalFoundries GF180MCU, a small team can push real RTL through place-and-route, DRC, LVS and stream out a GDSII file for a few thousand dollars in shuttle fees. The toolchain that makes this possible is fully open source — and it is the same stack used on silicon that has actually shipped.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
