<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nextest on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/nextest/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Nextest on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/nextest/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Rust Testing in 2026: cargo test vs cargo-nextest vs rstest — Which Should You Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-25-rust-testing-cargo-test-nextest-rstest-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-25-rust-testing-cargo-test-nextest-rstest-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Your Rust test suite is probably twice as slow as it needs to be, and the culprit is the default test runner you have never questioned. &lt;code&gt;cargo test&lt;/code&gt; runs every test binary sequentially, executes tests inside one process per binary, and gives you no retry story for flaky tests. The ecosystem has moved on: &lt;strong&gt;cargo-nextest&lt;/strong&gt; runs the same tests in parallel with per-test process isolation and is faster by an order of magnitude on real-world crates, while &lt;strong&gt;rstest&lt;/strong&gt; fixes the ergonomics gap — fixtures, parameterized cases, and matrix tests — that drives developers to copy-paste test setup. None of these tools competes with the others; they stack. This guide shows you how to combine them and where each one&amp;rsquo;s sharp edges cut.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
