<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ltsp on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/ltsp/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ltsp on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/ltsp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Thin Client Server Infrastructure: LTSP vs ThinLinc vs NoMachine NX</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-07-self-hosted-thin-client-server-ltsp-thinlinc-nomachine-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-07-self-hosted-thin-client-server-ltsp-thinlinc-nomachine-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Thin client computing centralizes desktop environments on a powerful server while users interact through lightweight terminals. This model slashes endpoint hardware costs, simplifies patch management, and keeps data centralized rather than scattered across hundreds of laptops. We compare three open-source thin client server platforms: &lt;strong&gt;LTSP&lt;/strong&gt; (Linux Terminal Server Project), &lt;strong&gt;ThinLinc&lt;/strong&gt; (by Cendio, free for up to 10 users), and &lt;strong&gt;NoMachine NX&lt;/strong&gt; (remote desktop with free edition).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
