<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Linting on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/linting/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Linting on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/linting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted SQL Linting and Formatting Tools: sqlfluff vs sqlparse vs pgFormatter</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-16-self-hosted-sql-linting-formatting-tools-sqlfluff-sqlparse-pgformatter-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-16-self-hosted-sql-linting-formatting-tools-sqlfluff-sqlparse-pgformatter-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;SQL linting and formatting tools catch syntax errors, enforce consistent style, and improve readability across your database codebase. Whether you are managing hundreds of migration files, writing complex analytical queries, or maintaining stored procedures, automated SQL linting prevents bugs before they reach production. This guide compares three open-source SQL linting tools with CI/CD integration guides.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
