<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Kubewarden on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/kubewarden/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Kubewarden on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/kubewarden/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Kubernetes Admission Controllers: Kyverno vs OPA Gatekeeper vs Kubewarden (2026)</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-16-self-hosted-kubernetes-admission-controllers-kyverno-opa-gatekeeper-kubewarden-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-16-self-hosted-kubernetes-admission-controllers-kyverno-opa-gatekeeper-kubewarden-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Kubernetes admission controllers are the gatekeepers of your cluster — they intercept API requests before objects are persisted, allowing you to enforce security policies, validate configurations, and mutate resources automatically. In this guide, we compare three leading open-source admission controller frameworks: &lt;strong&gt;Kyverno&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;OPA Gatekeeper&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Kubewarden&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
