<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Konva on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/konva/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Konva on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/konva/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Canvas Drawing Libraries in 2026: Konva vs Fabric.js vs Paper.js — Which One Should You Actually Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-22-canvas-drawing-libraries-konva-fabricjs-paperjs-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-22-canvas-drawing-libraries-konva-fabricjs-paperjs-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Whiteboard apps, diagram editors, image annotation tools, floor planners — every one of them starts with the same painful decision: which HTML5 Canvas library do you build on? Pick wrong and you will re-architect your rendering layer six months in, when selection, hit-testing, and undo suddenly become impossible to bolt on. The three serious contenders are &lt;strong&gt;Konva&lt;/strong&gt; (14,709 stars), &lt;strong&gt;Fabric.js&lt;/strong&gt; (31,403 stars), and &lt;strong&gt;Paper.js&lt;/strong&gt; (15,065 stars), and they are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; interchangeable: each one encodes a different mental model of what a canvas app is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
