<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Inversion-of-Control on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/inversion-of-control/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Inversion-of-Control on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/inversion-of-control/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Python Dependency Injection Libraries: dependency-injector vs injector vs punq vs rodi</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-07-03-python-dependency-injection-libraries-dependency-injector-injector-punq-rodi/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-07-03-python-dependency-injection-libraries-dependency-injector-injector-punq-rodi/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Dependency Injection (DI) is a design pattern that decouples object creation from object usage, making code more testable, maintainable, and flexible. While Python&amp;rsquo;s dynamic nature means you can often get by without a formal DI container, larger applications — especially those following Clean Architecture or Domain-Driven Design — benefit significantly from structured DI. This article compares four popular Python DI libraries: dependency-injector, injector, punq, and rodi, evaluating them on API design, performance, async support, and real-world usability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
