<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hlsjs on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/hlsjs/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hlsjs on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/hlsjs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>JavaScript Video Player Libraries in 2026: video.js vs Plyr vs hls.js — Which One Should You Actually Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-22-javascript-video-player-libraries-videojs-plyr-hlsjs-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-22-javascript-video-player-libraries-videojs-plyr-hlsjs-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Video is now the majority of web traffic, and the humble &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;video&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; tag is not enough: you need adaptive streaming, captions, custom controls, and playback that works across every browser — including the 60% of the mobile web where HLS is the only sane format. The three libraries that carry most of the load are &lt;strong&gt;video.js&lt;/strong&gt; (39,859 stars), &lt;strong&gt;Plyr&lt;/strong&gt; (29,961 stars), and &lt;strong&gt;hls.js&lt;/strong&gt; (16,886 stars). They are not competitors in the way most library trios are: two are &lt;em&gt;player UIs&lt;/em&gt; and one is a &lt;em&gt;streaming engine&lt;/em&gt; — which is exactly why teams keep getting the choice wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
