<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hdf5 on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/hdf5/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hdf5 on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/hdf5/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>HDF5 vs NetCDF4 vs Zarr vs TileDB in 2026: Which Array Storage Engine Should You Actually Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-11-array-storage-formats-hdf5-netcdf4-zarr-tiledb-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-11-array-storage-formats-hdf5-netcdf4-zarr-tiledb-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The first time you try to read a slice out of a 40 GB climate file, you learn the lesson that every data engineer eventually learns the hard way: &lt;strong&gt;the format you picked in hour one decides how painful year two is.&lt;/strong&gt; A monolithic &lt;code&gt;.nc&lt;/code&gt; file is a joy on one workstation and a liability in a stack of containers reading from object storage. A pile of chunked arrays is the opposite. Neither is wrong — but they are not interchangeable, and migrating later means rewriting every reader you own.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
