<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Git-Workflow on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/git-workflow/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Git-Workflow on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/git-workflow/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Git Interactive Rebase &amp; Fixup Automation: git-absorb vs git-autofixup vs git-revise</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-17-git-interactive-rebase-fixup-automation-git-absorb-autofixup-revise/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-17-git-interactive-rebase-fixup-automation-git-absorb-autofixup-revise/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Git&amp;rsquo;s interactive rebase is one of the most powerful tools for crafting a clean commit history. However, manually squashing, reordering, and fixing up commits can be tedious and error-prone — especially on large feature branches with dozens of commits. Enter automated fixup and rebase tools: they analyze your working tree changes, match them to existing commits that introduced those lines, and automatically generate fixup commits or rewrite history. This article compares three leading open-source tools for Git rebase automation: &lt;strong&gt;git-absorb&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;git-autofixup&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;git-revise&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
