<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Genome-Browser on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/genome-browser/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Genome-Browser on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/genome-browser/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Genomics Browsers: JBrowse 2 vs IGV Web vs UCSC Genome Browser</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-09-self-hosted-genomics-browsers-jbrowse2-igv-web-ucsc/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-09-self-hosted-genomics-browsers-jbrowse2-igv-web-ucsc/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Genomics data is exploding — a single whole-genome sequencing run can produce hundreds of gigabytes of data that needs interactive visualization. While cloud-hosted genome browsers like the UCSC Genome Browser and Ensembl provide excellent public resources, research labs and clinical organizations increasingly need self-hosted solutions for proprietary data, custom annotation tracks, and HIPAA-compliant environments. In this comparison, we evaluate three open-source genome browsers you can run on your own infrastructure: &lt;strong&gt;JBrowse 2&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;IGV Web App&lt;/strong&gt;, and the &lt;strong&gt;UCSC Genome Browser (self-hosted mirror)&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
