<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gem5 on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/gem5/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Gem5 on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/gem5/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Renode vs QEMU vs gem5 in 2026: Which Emulator Should Back Your Firmware Pipeline?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-23-firmware-emulation-renode-qemu-gem5-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-23-firmware-emulation-renode-qemu-gem5-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The weakest link in most embedded teams is not the compiler or the kernel — it is the physical board sitting on one engineer&amp;rsquo;s desk. One dev kit, one person flashing it, and a regression suite that only runs when somebody remembers to plug it in. Emulation fixes that, but the three obvious choices are not interchangeable: QEMU (13,753 GitHub stars) emulates fast enough to run a full Linux userspace, Renode (2,924 stars) models multi-node boards deterministically for CI, and gem5 (2,827 stars) trades speed for architectural fidelity you can publish papers about.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
