<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Folio on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/folio/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Folio on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/folio/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Koha vs Evergreen vs FOLIO in 2026: Choosing an Open-Source Library System That Survives Year Three</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-24-koha-vs-evergreen-vs-folio-open-source-library-system-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-10-24-koha-vs-evergreen-vs-folio-open-source-library-system-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most library system comparisons are written by people who have installed the software once, on a laptop, with a demo dataset. That is not where library systems fail. They fail in year three, when your consortium has 1.2 million bibliographic records, 40 000 active patrons, a nightly MARC import from three vendors, and a circulation desk that cannot be offline for a Saturday.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
