<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Flow-Collection on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/flow-collection/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Flow-Collection on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/flow-collection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted sFlow Collection &amp; Analysis: GoFlow2 vs Akvorado vs pmacct</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-20-self-hosted-sflow-collection-goflow2-akvorado-pmacct-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-20-self-hosted-sflow-collection-goflow2-akvorado-pmacct-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Network traffic analysis is essential for capacity planning, anomaly detection, and security monitoring. While NetFlow and IPFIX dominate enterprise environments, &lt;strong&gt;sFlow&lt;/strong&gt; (sampled Flow) offers a lightweight alternative that works across switches, routers, and servers at line rate. This guide compares three open-source sFlow collectors you can self-host: &lt;strong&gt;GoFlow2&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Akvorado&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;pmacct&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
