<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Emergency-Management on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/emergency-management/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Emergency-Management on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/emergency-management/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Computer-Aided Dispatch in 2026: Resgrid vs SnailyCAD vs OpenCAD Compared</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-22-self-hosted-computer-aided-dispatch-resgrid-snailycad-opencad/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-22-self-hosted-computer-aided-dispatch-resgrid-snailycad-opencad/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Commercial computer-aided dispatch (CAD) platforms are priced like enterprise software because they are enterprise software: per-seat licensing, five-figure implementation fees, and a support contract that renews whether or not you ever see the invoice line. For a volunteer fire department, a campus security team, a search-and-rescue group or an event operations command post, that pricing model is simply out of reach — which is why three open-source CAD platforms have quietly become the default for organisations that need incident logging, unit status and personnel accountability without a procurement cycle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
