<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dos on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/dos/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dos on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/dos/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>86Box vs DOSBox-X vs PCem in 2026: Which Retro PC Emulator Should You Actually Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-28-86box-vs-dosbox-x-vs-pcem-retro-pc-emulators/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-09-28-86box-vs-dosbox-x-vs-pcem-retro-pc-emulators/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Nobody emulates a 1998 desktop because it is efficient. You do it because a piece of software only exists for Windows 98, or because a demo from 1994 does something with the VGA hardware that a modern machine simply will not reproduce. The emulator you pick decides whether that works on the first try or turns into a weekend of config archaeology. The three serious open-source choices in 2026 — &lt;strong&gt;86Box&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;DOSBox-X&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;PCem&lt;/strong&gt; — split cleanly along one axis: how much of the original &lt;em&gt;machine&lt;/em&gt; they choose to reproduce.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
