<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Disk-Tools on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/disk-tools/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Disk-Tools on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/disk-tools/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Linux Data Recovery Tools: ddrescue vs TestDisk vs PhotoRec</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-25-linux-data-recovery-tools-ddrescue-testdisk-photorec-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-25-linux-data-recovery-tools-ddrescue-testdisk-photorec-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When a production server experiences disk failure, filesystem corruption, or accidental data deletion, the difference between a minor outage and a catastrophic data loss event comes down to having the right recovery tools pre-installed and ready to use. Three open-source utilities dominate the Linux data recovery landscape: &lt;strong&gt;GNU ddrescue&lt;/strong&gt; for block-level disk imaging, &lt;strong&gt;TestDisk&lt;/strong&gt; for partition recovery, and &lt;strong&gt;PhotoRec&lt;/strong&gt; for file carving. Each serves a distinct purpose in the recovery toolkit, and understanding when to deploy which tool is essential for any self-hosted infrastructure operator.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
