<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Disk-Imaging on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/disk-imaging/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Disk-Imaging on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/disk-imaging/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Disk Imaging &amp; Cloning Servers: Clonezilla SE vs Partclone vs G4L</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-07-self-hosted-disk-imaging-cloning-clonezilla-partclone-g4l-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-07-self-hosted-disk-imaging-cloning-clonezilla-partclone-g4l-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When managing a fleet of servers or workstations, re-installing operating systems one by one is a non-starter. Self-hosted disk imaging and cloning servers automate OS deployment by capturing a golden master image and multicasting it to dozens or hundreds of machines simultaneously over the network. This guide compares three battle-tested open-source tools: &lt;strong&gt;Clonezilla SE&lt;/strong&gt; (Server Edition with DRBL), &lt;strong&gt;Partclone&lt;/strong&gt; (the engine underneath many cloning tools), and &lt;strong&gt;G4L&lt;/strong&gt; (Ghost for Linux).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
