<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Data-Protection on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/data-protection/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Data-Protection on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/data-protection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Duplicati vs Duplicacy vs Duplicity: Self-Hosted Encrypted Backup Tools Compared 2026</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-04-22-duplicati-vs-duplicacy-vs-duplicity-self-hosted-encrypted-backup-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-04-22-duplicati-vs-duplicacy-vs-duplicity-self-hosted-encrypted-backup-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every self-hosted server needs a reliable backup strategy. Whether you&amp;rsquo;re protecting home lab data, business-critical files, or personal documents, having encrypted backups stored off-site is non-negotiable. Three established open-source tools dominate this space: &lt;strong&gt;Duplicati&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Duplicacy&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Duplicity&lt;/strong&gt;. Each takes a fundamentally different approach to encrypted backup, and choosing the right one depends on your storage backend, performance needs, and operational preferences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
