<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cookies on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/cookies/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cookies on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/cookies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Browser Storage in 2026: localForage vs js-cookie vs idb-keyval — Stop Losing User Data to the Wrong API</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-20-browser-storage-libraries-localforage-js-cookie-idb-keyval-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-20-browser-storage-libraries-localforage-js-cookie-idb-keyval-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Your user spends forty minutes building something in your web app, the browser tab crashes, and everything is gone. That is the silent failure mode of web storage: it is not a server outage, not a network issue — the data was sitting in a JavaScript variable the whole time because nobody shipped it to the right storage API. The average web developer now has &lt;strong&gt;three mainstream browser storage mechanisms&lt;/strong&gt; — cookies, localStorage, and IndexedDB — plus a pile of wrapper libraries that make the choice even more confusing. And the stakes are higher than they look: cookies ride along with every HTTP request, localStorage is synchronous and capped at about 5 MB, and IndexedDB is asynchronous, powerful, and famously painful to use directly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
