<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Containers on Pi Stack</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/containers/</link><description>Recent content in Containers on Pi Stack</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/containers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>gVisor vs Kata Containers vs Firecracker: Container Sandboxing Guide 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-04-20-gvisor-vs-kata-containers-vs-firecracker-container-sandboxing-guide-2026/</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-04-20-gvisor-vs-kata-containers-vs-firecracker-container-sandboxing-guide-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>When you run containers on a shared kernel, a single exploit can compromise every workload on that host. Container runtimes like &lt;a href="https://www.docker.com/">docker&lt;/a> and containerd rely on Linux namespaces and cgroups for isolation — effective for accidental misconfiguration, but insufficient against a determined attacker who escapes the container boundary. Sandbox runtimes solve this by adding an additional isolation layer between the container and the host kernel.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>containerd vs CRI-O vs Podman: Best Self-Hosted Container Runtimes 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/containerd-vs-cri-o-vs-podman-self-hosted-container-runtimes-guide-2026/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/containerd-vs-cri-o-vs-podman-self-hosted-container-runtimes-guide-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>Every container you run — whether it&amp;rsquo;s a web server, database, or microservice — depends on a &lt;strong>container runtime&lt;/strong> underneath. The runtime is the low-level software that actually creates, manages, and tears down containers on your host system.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Buildah vs Kaniko vs Earthly: Self-Hosted Container Build Tools Guide 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/buildah-vs-kaniko-vs-earthly-self-hosted-container-build-tools-guide-2026/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/buildah-vs-kaniko-vs-earthly-self-hosted-container-build-tools-guide-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>Building container images has become a daily task for developers, DevOps engineers, and platform teams. While &lt;code>[docker](https://www.docker.com/) build&lt;/code> is the most well-known approach, it requires a running Docker daemon and root-level privileges — both of which create security and architectural concerns in production CI/CD environments.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Portainer vs Dockge vs Yacht: Best Container Management Dashboard 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/self-hosted-container-management-dashboards-portainer-dockge-yacht-guide/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/self-hosted-container-management-dashboards-portainer-dockge-yacht-guide/</guid><description>&lt;p>Managing containers through the command line works fine for a handful of services. But once you are running a dozen containers across multiple hosts — databases, reverse proxies, monitoring stacks, media servers — clicking around a terminal gets exhausting fast.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Best Self-Hosted Container Registry 2026: Harbor vs CNCF Distribution vs Zot</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/harbor-vs-distribution-vs-zot-self-hosted-container-registry-guide/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/harbor-vs-distribution-vs-zot-self-hosted-container-registry-guide/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-self-host-a-container-registry">Why Self-Host a Container Registry?&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>If you run &lt;a href="https://www.docker.com/">docker&lt;/a> containers — whether for a homelab, a small team, or a production environment — you eventually hit the limits of Docker Hub. Rate limits, image size restrictions, privacy concerns, and dependency on an external service make a self-hosted container registry one of the most practical infrastructure decisions you can make.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm vs Nomad: Container Orchestration 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/kubernetes-vs-docker-swarm-vs-nomad/</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/kubernetes-vs-docker-swarm-vs-nomad/</guid><description>&lt;p>When your self-hosted setup grows beyond a single &lt;code>docker-compose.yml&lt;/code>, you need a container orchestrator. The question is: which one? In 2026, the three leading open-source options are &lt;strong>Kubernetes&lt;/strong>, &lt;strong>Docker Swarm&lt;/strong>, and &lt;strong>HashiCorp Nomad&lt;/strong>. Each takes a fundamentally different approach to the same problem — managing containers across multiple machines.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>