<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Competition on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/competition/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Competition on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/competition/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Tournament Bracket Management: Bracket vs Challonge vs Scoreboard Systems</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-06-self-hosted-tournament-bracket-management-bracket-challonge-scoreboard/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-06-self-hosted-tournament-bracket-management-bracket-challonge-scoreboard/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Running a tournament — whether it is an esports competition, a local chess club event, a cornhole league, or a corporate ping-pong bracket — requires an organized system for managing participants, generating brackets, tracking scores, and communicating results. While commercial platforms like Challonge and Toornament dominate the space with polished SaaS offerings, they come with subscription fees, branding requirements, and data lock-in. The open-source community has responded with self-hosted alternatives that give tournament organizers full control over their competition infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
