<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Code-Search on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/code-search/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Code-Search on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/code-search/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Code Search: ripgrep vs ag (The Silver Searcher) vs ugrep</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-16-code-search-tools-ripgrep-ag-silver-searcher-ugrep/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-16-code-search-tools-ripgrep-ag-silver-searcher-ugrep/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Searching through millions of lines of code is a daily task for every developer. Whether you&amp;rsquo;re tracing a function call across a monorepo, finding all uses of a deprecated API, or hunting down a configuration value buried in YAML files, your search tool&amp;rsquo;s speed and accuracy directly impact your productivity. While GNU grep has served faithfully for decades, a new generation of code-aware search tools has redefined what&amp;rsquo;s possible — scanning gigabytes of code in milliseconds with syntax-aware results and developer-friendly output. This article compares the three leading open-source alternatives: ripgrep (rg), The Silver Searcher (ag), and ugrep.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
