<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code-Quality on Pi Stack</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/code-quality/</link><description>Recent content in Code-Quality on Pi Stack</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/code-quality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>JaCoCo vs Coverage.py vs Istanbul/nyc: Self-Hosted Code Coverage Guide 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/self-hosted-code-coverage-tools-jacoco-coverage-istanbul-guide-2026/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/self-hosted-code-coverage-tools-jacoco-coverage-istanbul-guide-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>Code coverage is one of the most widely tracked software quality metrics. Knowing which lines, branches, and functions your tests exercise gives teams confidence when shipping changes. But sending coverage reports to cloud SaaS platforms like Codecov, Coveralls, or SonarCloud means handing your proprietary source metrics to a third party.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>SonarQube vs Semgrep vs CodeQL: Best Self-Hosted Code Quality Tools 2026</title><link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/sonarqube-vs-semgrep-vs-codeql-self-hosted-code-quality-guide-2026/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/sonarqube-vs-semgrep-vs-codeql-self-hosted-code-quality-guide-2026/</guid><description>&lt;p>Every software team faces the same challenge: code quality degrades over time unless you actively guard against it. Bugs sneak in, security vulnerabilities accumulate, and technical debt grows silently until it becomes a liability. The solution is static analysis — tools that scan your codebase for problems without ever executing it.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>