<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Client on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/client/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Client on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/client/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>C&#43;&#43; HTTP Client Libraries: cpp-httplib vs cpr vs curlpp vs Boost.Beast</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-30-cpp-http-client-libraries-cpp-httplib-cpr-curlpp-beast/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-30-cpp-http-client-libraries-cpp-httplib-cpr-curlpp-beast/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every C++ application that calls REST APIs or downloads resources needs an HTTP client. But the C++ ecosystem offers radically different approaches: from header-only single-file libraries to C wrappers with C++ bindings to Boost-integrated solutions. This guide compares &lt;strong&gt;cpp-httplib&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;cpr&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;curlpp&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Boost.Beast&lt;/strong&gt; across API design, dependency footprint, TLS support, and real-world performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
