<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Charts on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/charts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Charts on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/charts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>React Charting Libraries in 2026: recharts vs visx vs react-chartjs-2 — Pick the Right One and Never Rewrite Your Dashboard</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-20-react-charting-libraries-recharts-visx-react-chartjs-2-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-20-react-charting-libraries-recharts-visx-react-chartjs-2-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every dashboard starts with a bar chart and ends with a crisis. The first chart takes an afternoon. Six months later, the dashboard has twenty visualizations, the tooltip library is fighting the animation library, and your bundle is a slow, janky monster that product managers screenshot on good days and curse on bad ones. The root cause is almost always the same: the charting library was picked for a single chart, not for the next three years of dashboards. In 2026 the React ecosystem has three serious contenders — &lt;strong&gt;recharts (27,509 stars), visx (21,007 stars), and react-chartjs-2 (6,941 stars)&lt;/strong&gt; — and they represent three completely different philosophies of how to build visualizations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
