<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Chart-Validation on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/chart-validation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Chart-Validation on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/chart-validation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Helm Chart Testing: helm-unittest vs chart-testing vs kubeval</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-25-self-hosted-helm-chart-testing-helm-unittest-vs-chart-testing-vs-kubeval-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-05-25-self-hosted-helm-chart-testing-helm-unittest-vs-chart-testing-vs-kubeval-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Helm is the dominant package manager for Kubernetes, but deploying untested charts to production is a recipe for cluster failures. Self-hosted Helm chart testing frameworks catch misconfigurations, YAML errors, and policy violations before they reach your cluster. This guide compares three leading open-source tools: &lt;strong&gt;helm-unittest&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;chart-testing (ct)&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;kubeval&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
