<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>C3 on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/c3/</link>
    <description>Recent content in C3 on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/c3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Odin vs C3 vs V in 2026: Three Modern C Alternatives Compared With Real Code</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-11-01-odin-vs-c3-vs-vlang-modern-c-alternatives/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-11-01-odin-vs-c3-vs-vlang-modern-c-alternatives/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You have a 40,000-line C codebase, a build that takes eleven minutes, and a static analyzer that gives up somewhere around the third macro expansion. Rewriting in Rust is a two-year project nobody will fund. So you look at the three languages that promise C&amp;rsquo;s mental model without C&amp;rsquo;s foot-guns — and immediately hit the real question: &lt;strong&gt;Odin, C3, or V?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
