<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bioimaging on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/bioimaging/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bioimaging on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/bioimaging/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Self-Hosted Microscope Image Analysis: QuPath vs ImageJ/Fiji vs CellProfiler</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-09-self-hosted-microscope-image-analysis-qupath-imagej-cellprofiler/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-09-self-hosted-microscope-image-analysis-qupath-imagej-cellprofiler/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Modern microscopy generates terabytes of image data — from whole-slide pathology scans to time-lapse live-cell imaging. Processing, analyzing, and sharing these massive datasets requires specialized software that goes far beyond what consumer photo editors can handle. For research labs, clinical pathology departments, and core imaging facilities, open source microscope image analysis platforms provide a self-hosted alternative to expensive proprietary solutions like Imaris, MetaMorph, and HALO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
