<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Backtrace on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/backtrace/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Backtrace on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/backtrace/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>C&#43;&#43; Crash Reporting &amp; Stack Trace Libraries: backward-cpp vs Breakpad vs Crashpad</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-22-crash-reporting-backtrace-libraries-backward-cpp-breakpad-crashpad/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-22-crash-reporting-backtrace-libraries-backward-cpp-breakpad-crashpad/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When your C++ application crashes in production, the default experience is a cryptic &lt;code&gt;SIGSEGV&lt;/code&gt; with no context. Was it a null pointer? Buffer overflow? Use-after-free? Without a stack trace, you&amp;rsquo;re debugging blind. Crash reporting and backtrace libraries capture the call stack at the moment of failure — turning &amp;ldquo;it crashed&amp;rdquo; into &amp;ldquo;it crashed at &lt;code&gt;ConnectionPool::reconnect()&lt;/code&gt;, called from &lt;code&gt;HealthChecker::run()&lt;/code&gt;, with &lt;code&gt;this=0x0&lt;/code&gt;.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
