<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Asynchronous on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/asynchronous/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Asynchronous on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/asynchronous/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Linux Asynchronous I/O: libaio vs POSIX aio vs Kernel AIO for High-Throughput Servers</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-02-linux-async-io-libaio-posix-aio-iouring-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-06-02-linux-async-io-libaio-posix-aio-iouring-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When a server application reads from disk, every millisecond spent waiting for I/O completion is a millisecond not serving requests. &lt;strong&gt;Asynchronous I/O (AIO)&lt;/strong&gt; decouples I/O submission from completion, letting applications queue thousands of I/O operations and process results as they arrive. This article compares three Linux asynchronous I/O interfaces: &lt;strong&gt;libaio&lt;/strong&gt; (Linux native AIO), &lt;strong&gt;POSIX aio&lt;/strong&gt; (glibc), and &lt;strong&gt;kernel AIO&lt;/strong&gt; with io_uring — helping you choose the right interface for database engines, storage systems, and high-throughput file servers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
