<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Astro on Pi Stack</title>
    <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/astro/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Astro on Pi Stack</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.pistack.xyz/tags/astro/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Next.js vs Remix vs Astro in 2026: Which React Meta-Framework Should You Use?</title>
      <link>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-28-nextjs-vs-remix-vs-astro-react-meta-frameworks-comparison/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.pistack.xyz/posts/2026-08-28-nextjs-vs-remix-vs-astro-react-meta-frameworks-comparison/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Your page loads in 900 milliseconds on a fiber connection and 14 seconds on the phone your users actually carry. The Lighthouse score says 92 on desktop and 61 on mobile. The marketing site needs to rank in search engines, the dashboard needs real-time data, and the blog needs to render 40,000 posts without melting your hosting bill. Every React team in 2026 faces this decision at the framework level: &lt;strong&gt;Next.js&lt;/strong&gt; (the Vercel juggernaut with 141,968 stars), &lt;strong&gt;Remix&lt;/strong&gt; (the web-fundamentals rebel now built on React Router, 33,327 stars), and &lt;strong&gt;Astro&lt;/strong&gt; (the content-first islands framework, 62,108 stars). They overlap less than you think, and picking wrong means re-architecting your data loading six months in. This guide compares them with live repository data, official scaffolding commands, and real self-hosting configurations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
