When you want full control over your source code, nothing beats running your own Git forge. The big three in the self-hosted space — gitea, Forgejo, and GitLab CE — each take a different approach to the same problem. This guide breaks down their differences, shows you how to deploy each one, and helps you pick the right fit for your team.
Why Self-Host Your Git Forge
Running your own code hosting platform gives you advantages that no SaaS can match:
- Complete data sovereignty — your code, your issues, your CI pipelines never leave your infrastructure. No surprise ToS changes, no forced migrations.
- Unlimited private repositories — no per-seat pricing for private repos, no feature gating behind enterprise tiers.
- Custom CI/CD pipelines — runners execute on hardware you control, with access to internal networks, registries, and secrets.
- Zero vendor lock-in — migrate between instances, back up on your schedule, and integrate with any tool in your stack.
- Compliance and auditing — full control over access logs, retention policies, and data residency requirements.
Whether you are a solo developer tired of GitHub rate limits, a small team that needs internal code review workflows, or an organization with strict data governance requirements, a self-hosted Git forge pays for itself quickly.
The Three Contenders
Gitea — Lightweight and Fast
Gitea started as a community fork of Gogs and has grown into the most popular lightweight Git forge. Written in Go, it compiles to a single binary, runs on a Raspberry Pi, and starts in under a second. It mirrors GitHub’s UI closely, making the transition effortless for most developers.
As of 2026, Gitea is maintained by a commercial entity (Gitea Ltd) after a controversial reorganization in late 2024 that transferred the repository and trademark. This sparked the creation of Forgejo.
Forgejo — The Community Fork
Forgejo (“for-jay-oh”) forked from Gitea in December 2024 as a response to governance concerns. It is a hard fork — meaning the codebases share a common ancestor but are developing independently. Forgejo is governed by the Forgejo Community, a non-profit structure designed to prevent any single entity from controlling the project.
Key differentiators:
- Fediverse integration (ActivityPub) — your forge can interact with Mastodon, PeerTube, and other federated platforms
- Strict open-source commitment — no telemetry, no proprietary features
- Community governance — decisions made through open voting, not corporate leadership
- Forgejo Actions — built-in CI/CD compatible with GitHub Actions workflows
Forgejo tracks Gitea releases closely but adds its own features and patches. The project has gained significant traction among privacy-focused organizations and open-source purists.
GitLab Community Edition — The Full-Featured Behemoth
GitLab CE is the open-source edition of GitLab. It is far more than a Git forge — it is a complete DevOps platform with built-in CI/CD, container registry, package registry, security scanning, and more.
The tradeoff is resource consumption: GitLab recommends 4 CPU cores and 8 GB RAM minimum, while Gitea and Forgejo run comfortably on 512 MB RAM. GitLab CE is the right choice when you need an all-in-one DevOps platform and have the infrastructure to support it.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Gitea 1.23+ | Forgejo 10+ | GitLab CE 17+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Language | Go | Go | Ruby + Go |
| Minimum RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Database | SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL | SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL | PostgreSQL only |
| Built-in CI/CD | Gitea Actions (Actions-compatible) | Forgejo Actions (Actions-compatible) | GitLab CI (YAML-based) |
| Package Registry | Yes | Yes | Yes (comprehensive) |
| Container Registry | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Wiki | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Issue Tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes (advanced) |
| Federation (ActivityPub) | No | Yes | No |
| Kanban Boards | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Merge/Pull Requests | Yes | Yes | Yes (Merge Requests) |
| Code Owners | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Security Scanning | Limited | Limited | Comprehensive (SAST, DAST, dependency) |
| Container Scanning | No | No | Yes |
| LFS Support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Webhooks | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| OAuth2 / SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes (extensive providers) |
| Two-Factor Auth | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API | REST | REST | REST + GraphQL |
| Migration from GitHub | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Governance | Corporate (Gitea Ltd) | Community (non-profit) | Corporate (GitLab Inc.) |
Deployment: docker Compose
Gitea
| |
Deploy with:
| |
Then visit http://your-server:3000 to complete the initial setup wizard.
Forgejo
| |
The configuration is nearly identical to Gitea — just swap the image name. Deploy with:
| |
GitLab CE
| |
Deploy with:
| |
Set the root password after the container is ready:
| |
Setting Up Reverse Proxy with Nginx
All three forges benefit from a reverse proxy for HTTPS termination. Here is a unified Nginx configuration:
| |
Get a free SSL certificate:
| |
CI/CD Pipeline Setup
Gitea / Forgejo Actions
Both support GitHub Actions-compatible workflows. Create .gitea/workflows/ci.yml in your repository:
| |
Enable the actions runner on your server:
| |
GitLab CI
Create .gitlab-ci.yml at your repository root:
| |
Migration from GitHub
Moving your existing GitHub repositories to a self-hosted forge is straightforward.
Gitea / Forgejo Migration
- Navigate to your instance URL and create an account
- Click the + icon and select New Migration
- Paste your GitHub repository URL
- Enter your GitHub username and a personal access token
- Select which items to migrate: issues, pull requests, labels, milestones, and releases
- Click Migrate Repository
You can also migrate from the command line:
| |
GitLab Migration
- In GitLab, create a new project
- Select CI/CD for external repo > GitHub
- Authorize GitLab to access your GitHub account
- Select repositories to import
- GitLab imports code, issues, merge requests, and wiki pages
For bulk migration, use the github-gitlab-importer tool:
| |
Backup Strategy
A self-hosted forge is only as reliable as your backup plan.
Gitea / Forgejo Backup
| |
Add a cron job to automate:
| |
GitLab Backup
GitLab has a built-in backup command:
| |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Gitea if:
- You want the most mature, battle-tested lightweight forge
- You need excellent performance on minimal hardware
- You prefer a GitHub-like interface with no learning curve
- You do not mind corporate governance
Choose Forgejo if:
- Community governance and open-source purity matter to you
- You want Fediverse integration (ActivityPub) out of the box
- You are concerned about Gitea’s corporate direction
- You want a drop-in Gitea replacement with additional features
Choose GitLab CE if:
- You need a complete DevOps platform, not just a Git forge
- Your team requires advanced CI/CD, security scanning, and compliance tools
- You have the infrastructure resources (8+ GB RAM per instance)
- You want built-in container registry, package registry, and monitoring
Final Verdict
For most individuals and small teams in 2026, Forgejo represents the best balance of features, performance, and governance philosophy. It runs on a $5 VPS, supports GitHub Actions workflows, and gives you full control over your code without any corporate strings attached.
If you are already comfortable with Gitea and do not have governance concerns, Gitea remains an excellent choice — the codebase is mature and the user experience is polished.
GitLab CE is the pick for organizations that need an integrated DevOps platform and have the infrastructure to back it up. Nothing else comes close to its feature set, but the resource requirements are real.
No matter which you choose, the days of relying on a single corporate platform for all your source code are over. Self-hosting your Git forge gives you control, privacy, and peace of mind — and with modern Docker deployment, it has never been easier to set up.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Which one should I choose in 2026?
The best choice depends on your specific requirements:
- For beginners: Start with the simplest option that covers your core use case
- For production: Choose the solution with the most active community and documentation
- For teams: Look for collaboration features and user management
- For privacy: Prefer fully open-source, self-hosted options with no telemetry
Refer to the comparison table above for detailed feature breakdowns.
Can I migrate between these tools?
Most tools support data import/export. Always:
- Backup your current data
- Test the migration on a staging environment
- Check official migration guides in the documentation
Are there free versions available?
All tools in this guide offer free, open-source editions. Some also provide paid plans with additional features, priority support, or managed hosting.
How do I get started?
- Review the comparison table to identify your requirements
- Visit the official documentation (links provided above)
- Start with a Docker Compose setup for easy testing
- Join the community forums for troubleshooting