Electric vehicle ownership generates rich telemetry data — battery state, charging sessions, drive efficiency, location history, and more. Most manufacturers offer proprietary apps, but these come with limitations: vendor lock-in, questionable data privacy, and closed ecosystems that prevent integration with your existing smart home or energy infrastructure.
Self-hosted EV monitoring tools solve all three problems. By running your own vehicle data platform on a Raspberry Pi, home server, or VPS, you retain full ownership of every data point collected. This guide compares three leading open-source solutions: TeslaMate, EVCC, and the Open Vehicle Monitoring System (OVMS).
Why Self-Host Your EV Data
When you use a manufacturer’s native app, your driving data lives on their servers. Self-hosting gives you:
- Full data ownership — Every trip, charge session, and battery health metric stays on your hardware
- Local-first privacy — No telemetry sent to third-party analytics platforms
- Grafana dashboards — Beautiful visualizations powered by open-source dashboards, not a locked-in proprietary UI
- Smart home integration — Combine EV data with solar production, home battery, and energy consumption for optimized charging schedules
- Historical analysis — Track battery degradation over years, not months, without subscription fees
For EV owners with rooftop solar or time-of-use electricity pricing, self-hosted monitoring becomes even more valuable. You can automate charging decisions based on real-time energy production and grid pricing data.
TeslaMate: The Gold Standard for Tesla Owners
TeslaMate is the most popular self-hosted Tesla data logger, with over 7,900 GitHub stars and continuous development as of April 2026. Written in Elixir, it provides a comprehensive web interface and integrates seamlessly with Grafana for advanced dashboards.
Architecture
TeslaMate runs as a multi-container Docker stack with four services:
| Service | Purpose | Image |
|---|---|---|
| teslamate | Core data logger and web UI | teslamate/teslamate:latest |
| database | PostgreSQL storage for all telemetry | postgres:18-trixie |
| grafana | Dashboard visualization engine | teslamate/grafana:latest |
| mosquitto | MQTT message broker for internal comms | eclipse-mosquitto:2 |
Docker Compose Configuration
Here is the official deployment configuration from the TeslaMate documentation:
| |
Key Features
- Sleep tracking — Monitors when your Tesla enters deep sleep and calculates vampire drain rates
- Charging analysis — Detailed charge session logs with kWh delivered, cost estimates, and charging curves
- Drive statistics — Efficiency per trip, energy consumption by temperature, and elevation impact analysis
- Location history — GPS track logging with geofencing support for automatic charge/drive categorization
- Battery health — Long-term degradation tracking via capacity estimation over thousands of charge cycles
- Import/export — CSV import for migrating from other tools; export for backup and analysis
Resource Requirements
TeslaMate is relatively lightweight but requires PostgreSQL and Grafana. A Raspberry Pi 4 with 4 GB RAM or any x86 machine with 2 GB RAM runs it comfortably. The PostgreSQL database grows at roughly 10-50 MB per month depending on driving frequency.
EVCC: Smart Charging with Solar Integration
EVCC takes a different approach. Rather than logging historical data, EVCC focuses on intelligent charging control — optimizing when and how fast your EV charges based on solar production, grid prices, and battery state. With over 6,400 GitHub stars, it has become the go-to tool for solar-powered EV charging in Europe and beyond.
Written in Go, EVCC is a single binary that handles multiple EV brands, charger protocols, and energy sources.
Supported Hardware
EVCC works with a broad range of hardware:
| Category | Supported |
|---|---|
| EV Brands | Tesla, BMW, Mercedes, VW, Audi, Porsche, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan, Renault, Ford, Volvo, Polestar |
| Chargers | Wallbox, Heidelberg, easee, go-e, TWC3, Phoenix Contact, KEBA, openWB |
| Meters | Shelly, Tasmota, Home Assistant, Modbus, SMA, SolarEdge, Fronius, KOSTAL |
| Grid | Tibber, Awattar, Octopus Energy, Electricity Maps |
Configuration
EVCC uses a YAML configuration file. Here is a minimal example that ties solar production to EV charging:
| |
Running EVCC with Docker
| |
Key Features
- PV (photovoltaic) mode — Charges your EV using only excess solar production; automatically throttles charging current as solar output fluctuates
- Grid price awareness — Integrates with electricity price APIs to schedule charging during off-peak hours
- Multi-vehicle support — Manage multiple EVs with different charging priorities and schedules
- Battery management — Integrates with home battery systems (Powerwall, Sungrow, BYD) to coordinate EV and home energy storage
- MQTT integration — Publishes charging state and power data for use with Home Assistant, Node-RED, or custom automation
- Web UI — Real-time dashboard showing solar production, grid import/export, battery state, and charging progress
- API — REST API for programmatic control of charging sessions
Resource Requirements
EVCC is a single Go binary and runs comfortably on a Raspberry Pi Zero W. Typical memory usage is under 50 MB. No database is required — configuration is stored in a single YAML file.
OVMS: Multi-Brand Vehicle Monitoring
The Open Vehicle Monitoring System (OVMS) is the most hardware-agnostic option. Originally built for the Think City electric car, OVMS v3 now supports Renault Zoe, Nissan Leaf, Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, Hyundai Kona Electric, Jaguar I-PACE, and many others through community-developed vehicle modules.
OVMS uses a hardware module (typically an ESP32-based device connected to the vehicle’s OBD-II port) that communicates with a self-hosted server. This architecture means it works even with vehicles that lack built-in telematics APIs.
Architecture
| |
Server Deployment
The OVMS server requires MongoDB and can be deployed with Docker:
| |
Key Features
- Hardware-based monitoring — Works with vehicles that don’t expose a cloud API
- Community modules — 20+ vehicle-specific modules developed by the community
- Real-time alerts — Push notifications for charge complete, low battery, vehicle movement, and temperature extremes
- Location tracking — GPS position with trip history and geofencing
- Remote commands — Lock/unlock, start/stop climate control, and charging control (vehicle-dependent)
- Open protocol — The OVMS protocol is documented and can be integrated with custom applications
- Mobile apps — Official Android and iOS apps for remote monitoring and control
Hardware Requirements
Unlike TeslaMate and EVCC, OVMS requires a hardware module ($30-60 for an ESP32 dev board plus a compatible OBD-II adapter). This is both a strength (works without manufacturer API access) and a limitation (requires physical installation).
Resource Requirements
The OVMS server is lightweight — the Go-based server binary uses under 100 MB RAM. MongoDB requires 512 MB minimum. A Raspberry Pi 4 with 2 GB RAM is sufficient for a single-vehicle deployment.
Comparison Table
| Feature | TeslaMate | EVCC | OVMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supported Vehicles | Tesla only | 15+ brands | 10+ brands (with hardware) |
| Primary Purpose | Data logging & analysis | Smart charging control | Vehicle telemetry & alerts |
| Language | Elixir | Go | C (module) + Go (server) |
| Database | PostgreSQL | None (YAML config) | MongoDB |
| Docker Ready | Yes (4 containers) | Yes (single container) | Yes (2 containers) |
| Web Dashboard | Built-in + Grafana | Built-in | Built-in |
| Solar Charging | Via Grafana dashboards | Native PV mode | Manual via API |
| Hardware Required | None | None | ESP32 OBD-II module |
| MQTT Support | Yes (internal) | Yes (publish) | Yes |
| API | REST (via TeslaMateApi addon) | REST | REST + WebSocket |
| Mobile App | Web-responsive only | Web-responsive only | Android + iOS apps |
| GitHub Stars | ~7,900 | ~6,500 | ~800 (v3) |
| RAM Usage | ~800 MB (full stack) | ~50 MB | ~600 MB (with MongoDB) |
| Best For | Tesla owners wanting deep analytics | Solar-powered EV charging | Non-Tesla EVs without cloud APIs |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose TeslaMate If:
- You own a Tesla (Model 3, Y, S, or X)
- You want comprehensive historical data and beautiful Grafana dashboards
- You care about battery health tracking and long-term degradation analysis
- You want the most mature and well-documented option
Choose EVCC If:
- You have solar panels and want to charge your EV with surplus energy
- You have dynamic electricity pricing and want to optimize charging costs
- You want to manage multiple EVs and chargers from a single platform
- You need integration with home battery systems and smart meters
Choose OVMS If:
- You drive a non-Tesla EV that lacks a reliable cloud API
- You want a hardware-based solution that doesn’t depend on manufacturer servers
- You need vehicle-specific modules for older or niche EV models
- You want native mobile apps for iOS and Android
Combining Tools
These tools are not mutually exclusive. A common setup among self-hosting enthusiasts:
- TeslaMate for historical data logging and Grafana dashboards
- EVCC for intelligent charging control based on solar production
- Both communicate via MQTT to a central Home Assistant instance
The OVMS server can also be combined with EVCC — OVMS provides vehicle telemetry while EVCC handles charging optimization, bridged through MQTT messages.
Deployment on a Raspberry Pi
All three tools run on a Raspberry Pi 4 (4 GB RAM recommended). Here is a quick-start for the most popular option:
| |
For EVCC on the same Pi:
| |
FAQ
Can TeslaMate and EVCC run on the same server?
Yes. Both are Docker-based and can coexist on the same machine. TeslaMate uses ports 4000 and 3000, while EVCC uses port 7070. A Raspberry Pi 4 with 4 GB RAM handles both simultaneously. Many users run TeslaMate for data logging alongside EVCC for charging control.
Does OVMS work with Tesla vehicles?
OVMS has limited Tesla support through the vehicle’s CAN bus, but TeslaMate is significantly better for Tesla-specific data. OVMS excels with vehicles like the Renault Zoe, Nissan Leaf, and Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV where manufacturer APIs are limited or nonexistent.
Do I need a static IP or domain name?
For local-only access, no — just use your server’s local IP address. For remote access, consider using a reverse proxy with TLS (such as Traefik or Caddy) or a VPN tunnel. Never expose these services directly to the internet without authentication.
How much storage does TeslaMate’s database require?
PostgreSQL storage grows at approximately 10-50 MB per month depending on how frequently you drive. After one year of daily driving, expect 200-600 MB. With a 64 GB SD card or SSD, you have years of data before storage becomes a concern.
Can EVCC control non-EV devices like heat pumps or water heaters?
Yes. EVCC supports generic load points through its sma, shelly, and tasmota meter types. You can configure it to divert excess solar to a water heater, heat pump, or any smart plug that supports the configured protocol.
Is there a cost to self-host these tools?
All three are completely free and open-source. Hardware costs are minimal: a Raspberry Pi 4 ($35-75) for TeslaMate or EVCC, plus an ESP32 module ($10-30) for OVMS. Compare this to manufacturer telematics subscriptions that can cost $100-300 per year.
How secure is self-hosted EV data?
Self-hosting is more secure than cloud-based alternatives because your data never leaves your network. Use strong passwords for database and API access, keep Docker images updated, and use a reverse proxy with TLS for remote access. TeslaMate’s ENCRYPTION_KEY setting encrypts your Tesla API tokens at rest.
For related reading, see our HertzBeat vs Prometheus vs Netdata monitoring comparison for broader infrastructure monitoring options, the Grafana Pyroscope continuous profiling guide if you want to extend Grafana beyond EV dashboards, and our smart home bridges comparison for integrating EV data with home automation.